**yao-numbers"**, the existence of which is attested in an appendix of the Book of Changes known as

*Ta Chuan*(The Great Treatise).

Spherical Model (equatorial view) |

*xiantian*) index. Recall that the xiantian or scalar index of an hexagram is the decimal value of an hexagram figure rendered into binary. Scalar value is a reasonable indicator of an hexagram's magnitude; thus it appears a reasonable choice for placing the hexagrams of a given yao-group (which all lay on a common latitude) at specific meridians.

Spherical model (depicted with vectors) |

Spherical Model (polar view) |

*theta,phi*) on the sphere: THETA is the measure of latitude (declination from the positive vertical) while PHI measures longitude (angular displacement from a given meridian) on a latitude. The hexagrams are grouped, generally speaking, by yao-number and ordered within a yao-group by scalar value (XT).

As detailed in other entries, the yao-numbers of the paired hexagrams sum to 360. Additionally, these pairs have XT numbers summing to 65, thus they are complementary pairs. The spherical model presented here preserves those relationships.

One unexpected outcome of this effort was the discovery of a natural partition of yao-group[20] which, for lack of a self-consistent way to divide it, had been treated only as a unit. With the aid of the XT index, however, this group of 20 hexagrams falls naturally into halves: one half with XT less than 32; the XT of the other ten hexagrams exceeding 32. Only yao-group of 20 features this relationship. Indeed, only this group requires additional means to distinguish pair-mates.

Whereas they were previously presented as seven groups on discrete latitudes, the 64 hexagrams can now be portrayed as four groups of varying sizes, each group with equal-sized halves as shown in the table. These eight sections comprise an octo-partition of spherical space, bringing us full-circle (pardon the pun).

[NB: Consequently, the yao-groups should perhaps be redefined for the sake of clarity in designation:

[2 12 30 20] with modifiers '+' or '-' to indicate latitudes above or below the equator, respectively. Again, this coincides with the specification of a dodecahedron]

It seems like all the pieces are in place to begin using the model for vector analysis.

ReplyDeleteWhen, for example, #1 changes to #2, all lines change simultaneously. This might be depicted as a vector passing through the poles. Considering that the hexagrams on latitudes adjacent to a pole have but one differing line, perhaps the vectors travel across the surface of the sphere instead of through it.

Following this logic, we can track one hexagram's evolution across the sphere with a set of vectors that identify the changes that likely occurred over that evolution.

ReplyDeleteFormalism in quantum physics

ReplyDeleteSee also: Mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics

Pure states as rays in a Hilbert space:

Quantum physics is most commonly formulated in terms of linear algebra, as follows. Any given system is identified with some Hilbert space, such that each vector in the Hilbert space (apart from the origin) corresponds to a pure quantum state. In addition, two vectors that differ only by a nonzero complex scalar correspond to the same state (in other words, each pure state is a ray in the Hilbert space; equivalently, a point in the projective Hilbert space.).

Alternatively, many authors choose to only consider normalized vectors (vectors of norm 1) as corresponding to quantum states. In this case, the set of all pure states corresponds to the unit sphere of a Hilbert space, with the proviso that two normalized vectors correspond to the same state if they differ only by a complex scalar of absolute value 1, which is called the phase factor.

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_state_vector)