Saturday, April 23, 2011

Tree of Life: Nested Octahedron

The model (left) employs the mythos of the Tree of Life. In the model, Mankind and its home planet locate within the octahedral space at the center of the star tetrahedron.

YIN & YANG: the Two First Powers at the poles of the Universal Axis.

4 Symbols (xiang): at the corners of the rectangle, symbolize  seasonality & temporality.

8 trigrams 
(ba gua): arranged on the star tetrahedron, symbolizing primal forces of Nature.


Hou Tian (familial) arrangement of the Ba Gua
Father                    Mother  
Heaven                   Earth
Sons                       Daughters
1.      Thunder        1.     Wind
2.      Water            2.     Fire
3.      Mountain       3.     Lake


The Two First Powers, YIN and YANG give rise to xiang. Xiang produce the ba gua. Ba gua yield Change; Change enfolds the Universe. This assertion is found in scripture:

Therefore there is in the Changes the Great Primal Beginning. This generates the two primary forces. The two primary forces generate the four images. The four images generate the eight trigrams. The eight trigrams determine good fortune and misfortune. Good fortune and misfortune create the great field of action." (Commentary on I Ching, tr. Wilhelm and Baynes 1967:318-9)

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Derivation of the Natal Hexagram

Sample Natal hexagram construction:


ZODIAC
ELEMENT
SYMBOL
SUN
SCORPIOWATER
ASCENDANTCAPRICORNEARTH
MOONLIBRAAIR

An individual desiring to derive their own natal hexagram would simply use their birth horoscope to fill in the middle two columns of the chart.  The contents of the final column are determined by the following schema*, which maps the astrological elements to the Chinese xiang (symbols):
: Dynamic YANG = AIR
: Dynamic YIN = EARTH
: Stable YANG = WATER
: Stable YIN = FIRE


Once the final column is completed, the three symbols are simply copied line-for-line to form an hexagram.

Resulting Natal Hexagram (from sample data above)

⚎        (MOUNTAIN)
==>   =============  
==>    #41 (DECREASE)
⚌        (LAKE)


**Corresponding Tarot trump: XX (JUDGEMENT)

This presentation is derived (with minor modification) from the works of:
Charlie Higgins, “Mensionization Complementation: Construction of an I Ching/Astrological Natal Hexagram” (1997)

**Steve Krakowski's, “An Ancient and Occult Genetic Code” (1996) provides the mapping between Tarot trumps and I Ching hexagrams.

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

Xiang: The Yarrow Oracle Depicted Graphically


The yarrow oracle method as related through Ta Chuan (the Great Treatise) is attributed to Kung-fu Tze. The querent begins with 50 (fifty) yarrow stalks and manipulates them in a prescribed and probabilistic manner until few remain.  This remainder may take on one of exactly four possible symbolic values, though the actual number of stalks may vary according the the precise form of the ritual.  The symbolic values are sometimes referred to as 'xiang.'  Each manipulation of the stalks produces one line of a six-line figure commonly known as an hexagram.  Thus, six "randomly-generated" xiang produce an hexagram.  Once generated, the querent references the scripture according to that hexagram.

In recent years, capable persons have employed mathematics to reduce the yarrow-stalk oracle to the raw probabilities it produces for each of the four types of lines that may obtain from a divination operation.  The following table is a description of those lines and their relative probability of occurrence in divination:

dynamic yin,   represented by '6' and symbol ⚏ ( 4 in 64 = 0.0625)
dynamic yang, represented by '9' and symbol ⚌ (12 in 64 = 0.1875)
static yang,     represented by '7' and symbol ⚎ (20 in 64 = 0.3125)
static yin,       represented by '8' and symbol ⚍ (28 in 64 = 0.4375)


The graphic depicted here shows the xiantian arrangement overlaid on a tableau of concentric squares, each discretely colored. This presentation is remarkable in that it implicitly encodes the yarrow oracle probabilities; i.e.  each ring comprises a specific proportion of the hexagrams as shown in the table above.

Friday, January 21, 2011

Xiang: Relating Pranayama (breathing meditation) to I Ching

The four expressions below relate to the xiang of the I Ching/Taoist cultural tradition.  The meanings and breath counts are presented.  Circular breathing technique -- in through nose, out through mouth, or conversely -- is recommended.  The circular breathing and varying counts are presumed to assist in bridling mental activity by fixing it to the breath.  This exercise mimics the expansion/contraction cycle of the Universe at large as professed by the Vedic tradition.
(6) INHALATION -- DYNAMIC YIN
(8) (Hold to Fullness) -- STATIC YIN
(9) EXHALATION -- DYNAMIC YANG
(7) (Hold to Emptiness) -- STATIC YANG
The complete cycle is 30 counts, such that one may easily time or measure the duration of a meditation session using the fingers.  A complete minute of 60 seconds could consist of one cycle of circular breathing by inhaling through the nose and out through the mouth, and a reciprocal cycle of inhalation through the mouth and exhaling through the nose.  One may additionally employ mudra, asana, or mantra along with the breath meditation, thus making it a fully-fledged tantric exercise.  

The traditional associations of the first Two Powers are here presented

YIN: capaciousness, struction, form
YANG: creativity, action, function

Thursday, December 30, 2010

Modeling Tzolk'in

Tzolk'in is fairly well-known as the sacred calendar of pre-Columbian Maya people.  Its significance to that civilization has been treated by several prominent authors (q.v. Arguelles, Calleman, and Jenkins) in recent years.  It comprises 13 x 20 = 260 days, and can be used to represent many cycles of time used by the historical Maya, and to date.  Several additional factorizations of the Tzolk'in harmonic remain, though it is unclear what terrestrial, astronomical, or physiological cycles (if any) correspond to those.  Its better-known cycles include:

  • Five 52-day "seasons"
  • Four 65-day "seasons"
  • Thirteen 20-day periods called uinal
  • Twenty 13-day periods called trecena

If one should desire to begin observing and studying Tzolk'in and related cycles and how they play-out in one's life, it would prove useful to have a model handy, and if we wish to model the Tzolk'in, which everyday objects might be used?  


In the West, the number thirteen is often counted among the casualties of the marginalization of the Divine Feminine.  This topic has been treated by other authors in greater detail and quality, and will not be repeated here at any length.  A few examples are here provided: "unlucky 13,"  Friday the 13th  (day named for Norse goddess Freya), and the common absence of 13th floors in buildingsWhat this has done with respect to Tzolk'in, is to make objects embodying harmonics of thirteen fairly uncommon, compared to say, the number twelve.  


Returning to the opening topic, studying Tzolk'in with any serious intent might be made much more convenient if objects embodying harmonics of thirteen were more commonplace.  Casual investigation does produce a few familiar objects that loosely embody the 13:20 Tzolk'in harmonic.  For example, there are 4 x 13 = 52 weeks in the Julian calendar.  A regular deck of playing cards (sans jokers) contains 4 x 13 = 52 cards.  Tarot decks, from which playing cards are derived, comprise 6 x 13 = 78 cards.  Lastly, our very own Latin alphabet has 2 x 13 = 26 characters.  With adaptation and ingenuity, any of these objects (in theory) could be used as the basis for our model.


Tzolk'in model (closed)

A 3 x 3 x 3 arrangement of cubes is composed of 27 individual cubes.  Such an arrangement may be termed a 'hypercube' because it is a cubic shape formed from cubes.  This cube-within-cube fractal is akin to a dimension within (or beyond) the three  spatial dimensions. This formation is composed of three horizontal layers, each comprising three rows and three columns of cubes.  Removing the central cube yields a 3-dimensional formation of 26 cubes -- the sought Tzolk'in model.  Such a representation is arguably superior to one we might design from the objects listed above because it is markedly tangible, something we can touch and manipulate in various ways, a quality lacked by more conceptual representations.

Removal of the central cube is no arbitrary contrivance; it symbolizes the establishment of akasha, a concept intimately related to the notion of 'space', which is required for the existence of physical objects.  Consciousness, then, is fairly equivalent to space since consciousness is similarly required of the existence of mental objects.  


Of what use is any calendar without people to schedule their days and lives by means of it?  This 'empty' central position is thus required for the existence of the observer to 'mind' (attend to) the calendar and its cycles.  Additional support for this hypothesis is provided in Appendix I.

Tzolk'in is used in conjunction with the agricultural cycle. The Tzolk'in number 260 is alleged to be closely linked to human biology.  The number of discrete cell types in the human body is estimated at 260.  The average period of human gestation is estimated at 266 days.  The harmonic numbers 13 and 20 are said to correspond to the thirteen major joints of the human body (ankles, knees, hips, shoulders, elbows, wrists, and neck); and the twenty digits (fingers and toes).


The number 260 is also said to be related to prominent astronomical cycles, including the precessional cycle of ~26,000 years.  The pre-Columbian Maya are also said to have predicted eclipses by means of Tzolk'in.  The motion of planet Venus, well-known and highly-regarded by the Maya, was tracked by means of Tzolk'in.  

Physical construction of the Tzolk'in model quickly highlighted a practical issue: with a 'hole' at the center of the structure, the center cube of the crown layer lacks support to keep it in place.  A simple solution was to use adhesive to fix the cubes in place.  This solves the problem, but limits our ability to examine and manipulate the model, hence our model's utility is compromised.

The search for solutions to this problem revealed that subsets of the 26 cubes might be formed into fixed shapes that would not only provide a stable structure to surround the space at the center, it would also reduce the overall number of pieces required for assembly, thus simplifying the model.  It was also determined that while there are many ways to group the 26 cubes into fixed shapes to form a model that provides integral support for the space at its center, not every assembly is equally desirable.  The fixed shapes chosen for groupings should not be arbitrary; rather, they should meaningfully reflect sub-cycles of Tzolk'in.

Reasoning from the basis of 2 x 13 = 26 in composing our Tzolk'in model, it seems appropriate that the model would embody bilateral symmetry just as does the human body to which the it is said to relate. If we appeal to the use of Tzolk'in as a time-keeping device, it seems equally reasonable to consider the division of night and day as another basis for desiring symmetry in its formation.  Additionally, by employing symmetry in the design of the model, we effectively halve the amount of work required, since one half will mate the other.  
In sum, we are seeking to represent the number 13 with blocks in such a way that two such representations will produce a 3 x 3 x 3 formation with a space (symbolizing the observer) at the center. 

Since the base and crown layers of the Tzolk'in model each comprise nine cubes arranged in a square formation, nine cubes might likewise form the basis for each half of the Tzolk'in model.  Four additional cubes could then be placed atop these nine, while still allowing for the observer's position at center.  These restrictions on the assembly of the Tzolk'in model greatly limit the number of possible constructions.  For the sake of brevity and readability, this paper will not detail each the various means of constructing the model, but will instead concentrate on one particular construction that is presumed to obey each of the outlined restrictions while producing a useful model for studying Tzolk'in.

In a related paper, significant correspondences between features of I Ching (the Chinese Book of Changes) and the Mesoamerican Tzolk'in were detailed.  That theme is continued here.  One mentionable correspondence between the pre-Columbian Maya and the ancient Chinese regards veneration of the turtle or tortoise; in particular, the oracular use of tortoise shells.  References to the tortoise can be found in I Ching (hexagram 27, line 1; hexagram 41, line 5, and hexagram 42, line 2), reinforcing the claim of reverence paid to these creatures by the ancient Chinese.

In antiquity, tortoise shells were used to perform divinations.  The precise means by which this was done has apparently been lost to time, but historical records indicate that the later yarrow-stalk oracle was a great technological improvement over the elder tortoise-shell oracle.  We are given to know that the shells were prepared by first scribing them, then subjecting them to heat (as by placing them in fire).  The resulting cracks in the shell were then read by the diviner, who contextualized the reading through the question posed by the inquirer.  As with I Ching and Tzolk'in, the connection between tortoise shells and Tzolk'in is less than obvious.  Provided an illustration, however, we may begin to intuit the link.

Overhead view of live tortoise
The body of the tortoise shell (right) appears as a dome formed from thirteen fused scutes (plates), ringed by a number of smaller scutes.  Thirteen plates constitute the domed portion of the shell.  The importance of the number thirteen to the historical Maya has already been demonstrated here.  It was similarly described in a paper describing the connection between I Ching and Tzolk'in.

The correspondence continues: the thirteen plates of a tortoise's shell are arranged in a specific pattern: Five plates are centrally- and vertically-arrayed; these are braced on either side by a vertical array of four plates.  This 4-5-4 pattern is also present in our design of our Tzolk'in model. 

The halves of the Tzolk'in model are thus formed from three shapes; the complete model totals six pieces.  For each half, two shapes are composed of four blocks each, the remaining shape comprises five blocks, for a total of thirteen blocks per half of the model.  The halves of the Tzolk'in model are constructed symmetrically, but not identically; rather, they are anti-symmetric, or mirror-images, of one another. The following picture illustrates this.

Each five-block shape constitutes the majority of the base and crown of the model. To assemble the model, the two five-block shapes are laid flat and non-congruently, or with opposing “handedness.” The four-block pieces are then made to stand upright in the empty spaces of the former, within the 3x3 "footprint" established by the five-block shape.  The graphics in the appendix demonstrate the assembly in greater detail.

Lastly, support for the Tzolk'in model may be found in the original literature with which it is presumed to agree.  I Ching makes specific reference the tortoise shell in two closely-related hexagrams: line 5 of hexagram #41 ('Decrease') and line 2 of hexagram #42 ('Increase').  By 'closely-related' is meant that these two hexagrams comprise a pair in the traditional King Wen sequence.  Such pairs are figurative inversions; turn one on its head, and it is indistinguishable from its mate.  Thus, the pairs may also be thought as mirror-images.


Also of note is that line 5 of hexagram #41 and line 2 of hexagram #42 are each YIN and central to the YANG trigrams in which they appear (Mountain; outer trigram of , hexagram 41; and Thunder; lower trigram of hexagram 42). It is all the more fitting that even the names of these hexagrams ('Increase' and 'Decrease') denote anti-symmetric action or condition.  Anti-symmetry or complementarity are discussed elsewhere in more detail.


In each of the lines just mentioned, appears the phrase, “parties adding to the stores (of its subject) ten pairs of tortoise shells.”  A tortoise shell, as detailed above, characterizes the number thirteen.  “Ten pairs,” (i.e., twenty tortoise shells) constitute a precise description of the Tzolk'in harmonic 13:20, unambiguously indicating the number 260.  Q.E.D.

NB: It must be mentioned that this model currently suffers a deficit in that it does not presently account/incorporate the 7-day 6-night "rhythm," a feature that finds much support in current literature about the calendars of the Maya people, as well in original references.  It is the hope of the author to remedy this deficit in future treatments of this thesis.


References:
I Ching, ed. J. Legge; 
I Ching, ed. Karcher & Ritsema
C.J. Calleman; (2004), (2009)
http://www.lawoftime.org
I Ching Mandalas, Cleary (1989), Shambhala Publications Inc. (cover art)
"Consciousness and Calendars," Ian Xel Lundgold;  excerpted from "Mayan Calendar Comes North," June 22, 2004


Appendix I
Selected slides from a presentation given by Ian Xel Lundgold (2004)



Consciousness and Orientation


Appendix II 
Cross-cultural comparisons with the Tzolk'in model

Mayan Eight Division Sky Place


 Ba Gua (8 diagrams) of the I Ching Tradition
Cleary (1989), Shambhala Publications Inc.


Central section of Tzolk'in model




Appendix III
Several views of the Tzolk'in model using common wooden cubes


Closed model


Model with "upper half" removed

Interval view of separated halves


Halves separated and flattened

Exploded view of flattened halves


Quetzacoatl, the Winged Serpent



Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Fu Xi's Square: Tzolk'in Octo-partition

The diagram displayed at right presents the Book of Changes in the tabular form known as the Fu Xi sequence, widely held to be the original form of the sixty-four hexagrams presented by Fu Xi himself.  The Fu Xi diagram is also the earliest known depiction of sequenced binary integers, the discovery of which are commonly (and mistakenly) attributed to Gottfried Leibniz who reportedly learned of binary notation through a treatise written by Jesuit scholar Joachim Bouvet.


The white numbers at the upper-right corner of each cell of the diagram correspond to their ordering in the traditional King Wen sequence.  


The 64 hexagrams of the Fu Xi diagram are presented in an orderly structural arrangement:


Each hexagram (six-line figure) comprises a inner/lower trigram (three-line figure), and an outer/upper trigram.  In the diagram, columns are ordered by a hexagram's upper trigram; rows are ordered by the lower trigram.  Rows and columns cycle through the same trigram sequence:
☷ EARTH [1], ☶ MOUNTAIN [2], ☵ WATER [3], ☴ WIND [4], ☳ THUNDER [5], ☲ FIRE [6], ☱ LAKE [7], ☰ SKY [8]

The bracketed numbers following each trigram name above are associated with the Fu Xi  sequence of trigrams.  For example, the row with lower trigram MOUNTAIN is numbered [2].  The column numbered [3] has upper trigram WATER.  This row-column combination [2,3] locates hexagram #39 ䷦ (Obstruction).  This schema is similar to chess notation.


The following presentation of the Fu Xi diagram is doubly-indexed: once (in white) according to the King Wen's traditional ordering of the hexagrams (upper right corner); and as before, by Fu Xi's binary value (in black) for the hexagram (lower left).  The diagram is marked with eight color-coded pairs of hexagrams.


Arranged in this fashion, one easily observes that the binary values (in black) of the colored pairs sum to sixty-five.  In truth, this relation holds true over the entire 8 x 8 table; the sixteen colored figures presented are an arbitrary subset.
If we were to apply chessboard notation to the entire Fu Xi diagram: [1,1] at upper left  and [8,8] at its lower-right, any two figures with coordinates that combine to [9,9] are complementary antipodal pairs, having binary values which sum to 65.  


Our previous example of hexagram #39 (Biting Through) has hexagram #38 (Opposition) as its complementary antipodal pair.  


These thirty-two pairs of hexagrams are each complementary in the sense that each member of a pair has YANG lines where the other has YIN lines, and conversely.   


They are antipodal in the sense that they are separated by 180°of rotation, thus the pairs are maximally separated within the bounds of the square.






Finally, the binary values of these complementary antipodal pairs invariably sum to sixty-five.  In this context, the number 65 may be seen as suggestive of completeness or continuum.  Alternatively, as 1 querent + 64 hexagrams = 65, that number can symbolize divination, communion with the divine.


As each of the sixty-four hexagram figures has a discrete binary value ranging [1..64]they form thirty-two complementary antipodal pairs of hexagram figures.  Therefore, the Fu Xi diagram comprises a metric space of 65 * 32 = 2080,  also known to be the 64th triangular number.


We also observe that the number 2080 factors into 8 x 13 x 20 which implies that even this representation of the Book of Changes may be octo-partitioned (divided by eight).  


Pieces of Eight
Elsewhere we suggested that the Book of Changes may also be represented as a 4 x 4 x 4 hypercube as in the diagram at right.
Observe that the 2 x 2 x 2 hypercube (at left in the picture) is an octant (one-eighth piece) of the 4 x 4 x 4 hypercube.  Therefore, the 13 x 20 metric space is an octonary partition of the Book of Changes.


Students of the pre-Columbian Mayan culture will recognize 13 x 20 as relating to the sacred 260-day tzolk'in calendar.  Since tzolk'in comprises 260 days and is analogous to one-eighth of the Book of Changes, eight tzolk'in account 2080 days.  Coincidentally, a year of full-time work (40 hours * 5 days * 52 weeks) comprises 2080 hours.


We can also use the 4 x 4 x 4 hypercube representation of the Book of Changes to model tzolk'in. Observe: 
This suggests that tzolk'in's 13 x 20 metric space (260 days) can be fractioned into 2080 units, each unit accounting for one-eighth of a standard day, or three hours.  Eight of those 3-hour units would, if modeled using cubes, form a 2 x 2 x 2 hypercube, representing a standard 24-hour day.



Tzolk'in's own octonary partition (represented, for example, by the 2 x 2 x 2 hypercube) is a half-season of 32.5 days (260/8).  More common divisions of tzolk'in include the four seasons of sixty-five days, five 52-day periods, and twenty 13-day trecenas.

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Quantifying Change: Conjecture

Quantifying Change: Conjecture

One feature of the King Wen sequence particularly intrigues the author: Changes (expanded first-order differences) are defined over the ordered set of Wen pairs; this apparently causes the Changes to reproduce the King Wen sequence.  In the table of Changes following, as one reads across the vertical columns and down the rows in order, the Changes replay the King Wen sequence of the hexagrams with increased detail at the level of the individual hexagram lines.  The Change operation effectively recovers information about the internal statics and dynamics of the hexagram figures.  This recovered information allows us to derive the yao-numbers corresponding to the sixty-four hexagrams.  The yao-numbers, in turn, give us a means to quantify and categorize Change.
We term a pair 'unbalanced' when the yao-numbers of the pair-members are unequal.  Such unbalanced pairs appear four times in I Ching:  [1,2], [27,28], [29,30], and [61,62].  The hexagrams composing these pairs, incidentally, do not produce one another through fangua or hexagram inversion (reversing the order of the lines); they employ pantonggua (complementary opposition) to form a pair.  

King Wen pairs each seem to represent extremes of a continuum, since we can always determine the other half of a Wen pair provided we know the generative rules.  The Gates of Change, Chi’en and K’un, are the “father and mother” of the cosmos, but each King Wen pair can be similarly seen as constituting its own cosmos or continuum.  The self-similarity that permeates the actual world appears to be re-enacted via the relationships that obtain through the Change operation.

Now complete, how can we validate these findings?  What, if any, assurance have we that the Changes have a reflection in consensus reality?  Can we find corroboration of these findings there?